The Ministry of Finance has announced outrageous excise taxes to be applicable on environmentally friendly Eco vehicles or HYBRIDS which reduce consumption of fossil fuels, burn cleaner, emit less co2, cost less then fossil fuel vehicles. The public is outraged over the issue.
One Party State Mental State on Taxes
Excise Tax on HYBRIDS was 5% flat to encourage protection of the environment and to show Seychelles commitment to the environment. As of June 16 th, 2017, a one party state style tax ladder on HYBRIDS will take effect: 1. 1600cc - 12.5% tax , 2. 2000 cc - 37.5 % tax, 3. 2000-2500 cc 75% tax, 4. Above 2500 cc - 100% tax.
Add The VAT 15%
In addition to these taxes, VAT of 15% will be added to the vehicles. The policy will penalize Seychellois trying to buy a car, to improve their quality of life, and protect the environment. The super rich docked at Eden Island will remain un scathed as usual. Government officials who drive in new vehicles every three years will be unaffected.
Dealers Hurt
Dealers of vehicles will be hurt badly by this initiative, and it will be a negative on the business climate. Those who have invested dearly to set up dealer ships will be at a loss due simply to more bad policy, not market forces. The regime will add even more unpredictability to the Seychelles government and how they do things under the coco nut tree at Ministry of Finance. Last year, MOF scrapped Trades Tax, implemented Excise tax system to divert and nullify the Tourism Incentive Act, providing concession to the Tourism Industry, since they are the main hard currency earners in the country. Again, many business relied on TIA and trusted the government, they were let down in classic one party state style.
Keep Your Word Challenge
A government that cannot keep its word, is a government that cannot be trusted. Simple!
Sesel Pou Seselwa!
May God Bless All Freedom Loving Seychellois!
31 comments:
Where in the world has you herad an absurdity like this ....Instead of implementing a CARBON TAX on fossil fuel used cars which have negative impact on environment pl IMPLEMNT EXCISE TAX ON HYDRID ....iT SEEMS PL BELEIVES IT IS HYDRID CARS THAT POLUATE AND NOT car using fossil fuels........Maybe pl thinks like Trump climate change is a hoax.....How cvan someone proclaim and sing the songs on climate change ,envoronemnt protection on world stage than do exactly THE OPPOSITE ......iN FACT ,BY IMPLEMNTING A carbon tasx ON CAR USING FOSSIL FULE gOVERNMENT WOULD COLLECT MUCH MORE TAX THAN ON HYDRID CARS ...THE ALTTER SHOULD BE TAX EXAMPLE SO THAT TO ENCOURAGE INDIDIVUDALS TO MAKE THE CHANGE FROM FOSSIL PROPELLED CARS TO HYDRID ,ELECTRIC .OR COMBINATIONFO GAS ELECTRICITY ETYC ......
tHIS EXECISE TAX ON HYDRID CARS MUST BE BOYCOTT AND REFUSE BY SITIZENS FOR IT SERVE NO PURPOSE THAN SUCKING SEYCHELLOIS FROM MORE MONEY ..AND IT IS Exactly the opposite pl governemtn should namely Put a carbon TAX on cars using fosill fuel which are the majority in Seychelles ...........
By taxing individuals having hydrid cars pl government shows that it is not for renevweable energy ,,,,less poluated CARS but those that poluate air and environment and thereby increase health hazard on our citizens that is not acceptable.......
Putting an ecxcise tax on those indidivduals who are doing their parts to fight air pollution and environment it will means more expensive cars thus this does not encourage people to participate in amking the lateration from thre use of poluated cars using fossil fuel but discourage them .......
In fact ,all cars prpel by Hydrid moter .eltricxcal and other environment friendly means should be excise tax exemple while cars like those big cars being driven by pl members ,arabs should Pay a CARBON TAX ..... \wE MUST OPPOSE THIS REDICULOUS AND ABSURB EXCISE TAX ....gOVERNEMTN SHOULD BE ENCOURAGING INDIVIDUALS TO SWITCH FROM POLUATED CARS TO CLEAN CARS ...AND THE WAY TO DO THAT IS EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE WHAT PL WANTS NAMELY IMPLEMNT A carbon tax ON all VEHICLE OWNERS .... AND NOT THOSE WHO ARE PATRIOTICALLY PARTICIPATING TO REDUCE AIR POLUTION IN CITIES AND HELP IMRPVOE THE AIR QUALITY WE BREATH AND HELP RPTOECT THE ENVIRONEMNT......
tAX THE MAJORITY AND THE MAIN POLUTORS PL NOT THE MINORITY TRYING TO PARTICIPATE IN REDUCING AIR POLUTION AND EWNVRIONEMNT ./?tax KHALFIA BIG CARS ,,,,,THOSE BIG CHARTER YACHTS ,,,,,THOESE BIG PL MEMBERS POLUATED BIG CARS ETC ....PL THEN GOVERNEMNT COULD GENRATE AN IMPORTANT AMOUNT ...
\\STOP BULLSHITTING SEYCHELLOIS PL ......
gRAND MASTER OF ENVRIONEMNT PL TAX THOSE PARTICIPTAING IN PROTECTING ,BETTERING OUR AIR AND NEVIRONEMNT INSTEAD OF THOSE THOUSANDS OF CARS USING FOSILL FUELS THE REAl poluators .give us a break pl....
We will not accept any taxation on clean cars pl ..but on dirty cars by introducing a CARBON TAX on them
Tax on hybrid?????????????????
Are they serious????????
The whole world is paying you with cash rebates if you go hybrid.
What the hell is going on?""????
Taxing Hybrid at these rates is totally unacceptable. It destroys Seychelles image as a environmental conscious destination.
Negative marketing will en sue.
Hydrid ,electrical cars should never be tax at all....noting also that individual driving hydrid cars are a handful ...in fact less than hundred individuals ..thus a minority....Pl should tax the majority has is cars being propelled by fossil fuel not the contrary.......
iT SEEMS pL ALWAYS UNDERSTANDS THINGS THE OPPOSITE WAY ...jUST LIKE WITH RENEWEABLE ENREGY ......LOTS OF BLAH BALH ,,BUT LITTLE DONE WHILE mORIN BUY NEW GENERATORS INSTEAD OF PALCING SOALR PANELS ON INDIVIDUALS HOUSES...IT SEEMS PL RIGHT BRAIN IS ON THE LEFT AND THE LEFT BRAIN ON THE IRGHT WHICH EXPLAIN WHY THEY THINK OPPOSTIE OF WHAT IS RIGHT....
cannot ACCEPT A TAX THAT TARGET A HANDFUL OF INDIDVIDUALS AND NOT THE MAJORITY ......PL .....
carbon TAX ON ALLL CARS USING FOSSIL FUEL PL ...THESE ARE HELPING DESTORY ENVIRONEMNT ,CLIAMTE CHANGE Because of green house gas ,,,not hydrid donkeys ....
What a fiasco! Typical case of paper pushers screwing up an economy.
They applied the. New tax because they say GOS has lost a lot of revenue under 5% scheme on imported vehicles.
When Tax was made 5% plus 15 % what strategy did PS Payet put in place to recover additional rev. So the net tax collection would be same ? None.
He unplugged a hole and left it that way, went off to have a Singapore sling at Eden Bleu.
Bareboat taxes? None in place.
Taxes on Eden Island apartments run as hotels? None in place.
Taxes on yachts or fee for anchoring? Does not exist.
We should not be over taxing our citizens when our population is 89000 and we receive 380,000 tourist a year. It just does not make sense .
yES GOS ,petrol stations -fossil feul car imporers manz pl friends ..hydrid is cometiting with them,etc.. owed by pl members ..It is know that pl is always clietalism first before the country ..we need to send them all to sweep public streets in three years time...
MPS of the opposition must vote against this amoral and crook law .......thast impede progress and which does not put countrz first but rather pl personal intrests ....
TAx of Eden island and on all land gifted to foreigners for one rupee for hundred years... charter zachts no paying ankering fee,,higher fee on fish ,vegetable etc importation bz five star hotels often owes by pl foreign friends,,,,Airport parking fee on khalifas big airplane.....$$$We must simplz say no to pl shit and pressure MPS to oppose this sillz and absurb excise tax which target less than hundred individuals AND DISCOURAGE THE USAGE OF CLEAN CARS .....pL SHOULD INTRODUCE A carbon tax ON ALL VEHICLES,YACHTS ETC THEY ARE IN THOUSADNS THUS MILLION OF RUPEE THAT CAN BE COLLECTED ON the majority AND REAL POLUTORS RATHER THAN PRATICE DISCRIMINATION BZ TARGETING THE MINORITZ INSTEAD OF MAJORITY.
oF COURSE ONE MUST NOT BE A ROCKET SCIENTIST TO UNDERSTAND THAT PL DECISION IS REDICULOUS AND WOULD DESTORY APEPTIE FOR ELECTRICAL ,HYDIRD OR CLEAN VEHICLES SO THAT PL FRIENDS AND MEMBERS COULD CONTNIUE TO SELL THEIR FOSSIL FUEL while green house gas increase and wwhilöe pl sings climate change around the world.
In fact ,,,it is a discriminitaory act that disfranchise one side and impede free trade and promote new investment ....It is unfair trade for pl penaliye a targeted group in order to favour pls friends and members unable to compete but rather want to monopolize the sectors.....
Pl thinks it i^will create a hole in the treasury........less money to be collected on fossil duel sell ,,however pl donkeys ignore the fact that those owing hydrid psend more on their electricity llls ..electricity used to recharge their cars.......in other word,while pl lost revenue on fuel ,,PUC pocket it on electricity from the same individuals .......)THE SAME PROBLEM IS WHEN IT COMES OT THE USAGE OF RENEWABLE NEERGZ ...pL AND mORIN THINKS THEZ WOULD NOT POCKET THE MILLIONS THE USE TO AS BEFORE .......=BUT IN REALITY THESE ARE FUTURE TECHNOLOGIES THAT ANY GOVERNEMNT OR COUNTRY SHOULD BE PREAPRE TO MAKE THE CHANGE FOR IT IS about the future ,,it is about climate change ,IT IS ABOUT REDUCING GREEN HOUSE GAS,,,,,,,,ETC.......THUS THE A MAIN PART OF THER SOLUTION TO FIGHTING CLIMATE CHANGE ETC........aND IN THIS CASE GOVERNEMNT SHOULD HAVE LONG BEEN LOOKING FOR OTHER MEANS TO COMPENSATE THE NORMAL AND NATURAL LOSS OF REVENUES OF FOSSIL FUEL ,,OR FOSSIL ELECTRICAL GENERATORS ...FOR THE LATTER ARE BECOMING OBSOLATE ....pL HAS FAILED TO FORSEEN AND PREAPRE FOR THESE IMPORTANT CHANGE AND USEAGE OF NEW TECHS .AS ALWAYS ..JUST AS THE FIALED TO ENSURE AS DEVELOPEMNT ,CONSTRUCTION ,INCREASE OF POLUATION FAILED TO BUILD WATER SUPPLZ ,ELETRCITY CAPACITZ ,,WEASTAGE MANAGEMENT ...BECUASE THEY FIALED TO UNDERSRTAND THAT THESE INFRATRCUTUERE GO HAND IN HANDS....
wE MUST NOT ONLY SATOP PL FOLOLIES BUT MAKE SURE WE FINISH THEM IN THREE YEARS ,,THESE GUYS ARE UNDER QULAIFIED ,,,CROOKS AND BELONG TO DOING MENIAL WORKS ASUCH AS CLEANING PUBLIC wcs ,STREETS ,BEACHES ,GAURDING PRISONS ETC...NOT AS MINISTERS OR IN HIGH OFFICE ,,THEY JUST DONOT HAVE THE INTELLLECTUAL ABILITY AND CAPACITY...
nOW WHAT COULD HAVE GOVERNEMNT PRE PLANED TO COMPENSATE THE LOSS ON FUEL PRUCHASE ---WELL WE HAVE THE NATURAL RESOURCVES TO PRODCUE mnFROM SEAWWEDS WHICH WOULD HAVE GENRATED MULTI MILLIONS OF DOLLARS ..wHY ..FOR PHARMACEUTIC INDUSTRIES ARE LITERALLY ALWAYS LUCRATIVE AND HAVE HIGH DEMANDS ......instead OF IMPORTING TONS OF CONTAMINATED CHICKENS FROM bRAYIL WHICH COST MULTI MULLIONS OF CONSUMERS ANNUALLY WE COULD HAVE USE ONE OUTTER ISLAND TO FARM CHICKENS FOR NATIONAL COSUMPTION THEREBZ INVESTIING LOCALLY AND GENRATING MULLIONS OF RUPEES ....
oN TAXING CITIZENS ....WELL I BELEIVE FIRMLZ ,,AS IT IS THE CASE IN ALL MODERN SOCIETIES INCLDUING THE RICHEST OF THE RICHEST LIKE Sweden ,sWITYERLAND ,Norway ETC ..THST EACH AND EVERY CITIYEN HAVE A MORAL DUTY AND OBLGIATION TO FIANAICALY CONTRIBUTE TO SOCIETY BZ PAYING A TAX THAT aFFECT ALL CITIYENS.........aND THE BEST AND EQUATE SOLUTION TO TAX CITIYENS IS NOTBY TAXING A MINORITY BECUASE THEIR ACTIONS COMPETE AND CHanllenge exisiitng companies but a tax such as a reduction of 5 to 10 percent on the annual +3th monthly slary pockets bz employees hus a majority .....A society cannot continue to provide all for free to its citiyens ,,citzens have obligations and participating fiancnally to society is one important obligation...
Of course ,the socialist system of pl thinks disfranchising individuals in roder to give citiyensALL FOR FREE in a good thing ,,or promoting depednecy on state is natural.......but historz shows communist countries have all failed and become unsustainable on a long term ,...Pl think it is an obligastion to provide all for free to citizens else you will bankrupt the country....
tHIS FIALED COMMUNSIT POLICZ OF CREATING A CULTURE OF DEPEDENCY ON STATE MIGHT HAVE WORK FOR A TIME WHEN POPULATION WAS LOW AND COST OF LIVING LOW TOO ..BUT IT IS JUST UNSUSTAINBLE WITH AN INCREASE POPULATION ,AGINF POPULATION ,,,ETC...ETC.......IN OTHER WORDS THE COUNTRY CANNOT GENRATE ALONE THE MONEY IN ORDER TO PORVIDE THE FREE SRVICES THAT WERE POSSIBLE 4 DECADES AGO ......AND THE ONLY WAY TO ENSURE THAT OUR FREE HEALTH SERVBICES ETXC KEEPS THE STANDARD ..PGVERNEMNT MUST UNDERSTand that everything for free is devastating economically and unsustainable AS WE SEEING NOW ,,,AND THE SOLUTION IS TO ENSURE CIIIYENS PARITICPATE ALSO LIKE IN ANY MODWRN SOCEITY ,,AND THAT COMMUNIST IDEOLOGY OF PROVDING EVERYTHING FOR FRE TO CITIYENS ENCOURAGE DEPEDENCY ,,,POUT AT RISK OUR ECONOMY AND SUCH IDEOLOGY IS DSESTRUCTIVE AND ABNSOLETE.....
pL CAN REDUCE 5 TO 10 PERVENT ANNUALLY ON THE 13TH SALARZ ,,,ÎNTRODUCE A carbon TAX ON ALL VEHICLES INCLUDING BOATS.....ETC .CREATE NEW IMPORTANT NATIONAL INDUSTRZ SUCH AS THE PRODCUTION OF MEDICATION FROM SEAWEEDS WHICH SI A LUCRATIVE INDUSTRY AND ANY OTHER THINGS .....fOSSIL FUEL TIME IS GETTING TO AN END ..THE FUTURE IS IN RENEWABLE ENRGZ AND NEW TECHNOLOGY ......PL DONKEYS...THERE ARE INDSUTRIES THAST WERE PROFTABLE 4 DECADES AGO BUT WITH NEW TECHS OLD INDUSTRIES USING OLD TECH MIGHT BEREOMCE ABSOALTE AND COLLAPSE FROM USUAGE OF NEW TECHS .........IT IS SOMETHING NORAML IN HUAMN ECONOMIC PROGRESS AND DEVLOPEMNT ...dECADESA AGO WE SUE latrine WITH NEW TOILET latrine HAS DESASPEARED ,,,dITO TO THOSE BIG TELELPHONE OF THE 50S ,,TODAY THEY DESASPEARED DUE TO iPHONE ..E...tHIS KIND OF SITUATION WE WILL FACE AS HUAMN PROGRESS AND NEW TECHS ARE FOUND .........THEREFORE WE MUST adapt ,,,,
TZoday renewable nergz and clean cars etc ,,are the future ,,cars with fossil fuel will one day come to an end ........
Thats LEPEP STYLE.
IF IT MOVES FAST OR SLOW.
THEY TAX.
SOON THEY WILL ADD MORE TAX ON LA DIGUE BICYCLES.
OLI PROBLENM.
MANRTEN FOUTOU.
Am surprise no tax on those vendors selling coconuts to tourists over 50 rupees.
If they do they can have money to build WCs and take care of stray dogs.
Also proper snack concessions where flies will not bother you!
All licensed businesses regardless OF SEIZE SHOULD BE TAXED.pL argument is that it must do so that all pays the same excise tax percentage ...that is as that of normal cars ..........Well Pl ..the idea of implementing a low tax on hydrid was to encourage individuals to import clean cars vehicles in a National objective to switch from poluated cars to clean cars thereby reduce Green house gas ,pollution and the consumption of fossil fuel in order to fight climate change and reduce dependency on fossil fuel......
One might thinks ,,you know what increase in excise tax on hydrid just bring eqaulity ..that is everybody pays the same which is just an excuse from govt ..because I guess when Pl leasd Seychellois properties to foreigners from SR 1 rupee hundred years it seems to me Pl does not question the disadvantage it has on Seychellois who donot benefit from SR 1 rupee land lease a hundred years but foreigners do.....
And finally cars propelled by fossil fuel are tx higer because they cause more damamge to the environment ,health and climate change ..,,which hydrid do not........in other word that thast vehicles which poluate more be taxed more should be tacit and that vehicles which poluate less pays less should be normal ....Pl justification is absurb and does not hold water ...for we could challenge pl on land lease whereby foreigners pays nothing and Seychellois pays everything....
Note also that a hydrid car is more expensive than a petrol car......Charging the eletrcial motor increase customer eletrcity bills ...because Pl government has not plan in regardless to clean cars therefore not plan to instalt electrical chargingstation around the country .......as long as this is done customers would continue charge their cars at home thus due to the lack of charging station ..charging cost stays high .........
Now that pl has shown that preaching about climate change ,environment is just a catchword ...maybe pl should stop pocketing money supposedly for environmental projects for other countries for pl has failed to practice anything that goes in this way.....//
You have STRAY DOGS ..WHICH PL HAS A DUTY TO CONTROL //how BY SEARCHING FOR OWNERS AND MAKE THE LATTER TAKE THEIR RESPONSIBLITY ..AND IF THEY FAILED ..STATE SHOULD GET THE JOB DONE AT THE EXPENSE OF IRRESPONSIBLE OWNERS ....THAT IN THE FUTURE ALL DOGS ARE DECALRED AND REGSITERED BY OWNERS ELSE THEY WILL FACE FINE AND THAT ALL DOGS ARE EQUIPPED WITH A CHIP THAT WOULD INDENTIFY DOGS AND OWNERS THAT COULD BE USE TO FIND OUT OWNERS OF STRAY DOGS ....
wCS WE STILL AWATING FOR PL TO GET THE JOB DONE...GRAND ANSE BEACH lA DIGUE AND OTHER PALCES AROUND THE COUNTRY ...
sOLAR POWERED STREET LIGHTS ,,,,,,
sTOPPING USING CLORINE TO PURIFIED DRINKING WATERS WHICH ON THE LONG TERM THE CHLORINE CAN CREATE HEALTH PROBELM ...THENEW USED TECHNOLOGY OF TODAY WITH IHGHER EFFECACITY IS THE USE OF (UNTRAVBOILET PURIFCATION SYSTEM) THAT PURIFY WATER BY 90 PERCENT ONE GO .........IT IS ENVIRONEMTNALLY FRIEND ,EFFCTIVE ,AND CAUSE NOT LONG TERM HEALTH HAZARD TO CITIZENS...Chlorine on the other hand when taking bath for instance penetrate the skin and air,,,..health hazard related to chlorine are: ...heart problem ,cancer as the Medical college of winconsin research team and others have demonstrated.......Which might partly explain why so many Seychellois develop cancer.
It should be normal in the 21st century that vehicles that polute and consume lots of fossil fuel be taxed higher than clean cars such as hydrid ,electrical ,gas etc cars ...Pl justification in regard to the increase on excise tax for hydrid cars is ridiculous ....
One blogger said" Bycatch fisdh cooled by ammoniac and therefore the cause for cancer" this cannot be proven for their is not direct contact of ammoniac to fish"however ,it has been proven that the consumption of clhorine on a dially and long term basis causes cancer .heart problems and I could imagine that is the main cause of increase cancer cases in Seychelles for the last decades .....
and this could be change be using more effcitve ,clean technology of prufication called ULTRAVOILET water purification system ...it destroy bacteria etc ....in one procees by 90 plus percent which chlorine does not od ....an other negaticve effect of chlorine is that since it is poured directly into rivers ...it poluate and affect sweat waters speices rive plants etc .......
The reason why Michel implemented a lower tax on importation of hydrid ,electrcial and other clean cars was to encourage Seychellois to buy clean cars ..which was the right thing to do and should be a policy in order to switch from dirty cars to clean cars ......And by the way that is the norm in literally all countries promoting the usuage of clean cars.......So the reason now being given by the fiancé minster is absurb.......
Manrten foutou. Some people do really have 'ti lespri'. How will lepep get all the tax money they are now collecting on petrol if all the cars were hybrid or electric.
Oli problem?
Well naturally it will never get and this apply not only to Pl or Seychelles by literally all countires switching from fossil fuel usuage to reneweable enrgy ,cars etc ....the different between pl and let us say western government which hAVE UNDERTAKEN SUCH STEP ... is that the altter work a plan ..a long term plan long before in order to create alternative soruces to compensate the revenues they would loss or used to generate from the use of fossil fuel ....pl never plan lpng term and intelligently....
And moreover ,,,,these countries which pre /pared the switching from fossil to clean energy ..like the promotion of electrical cars ...they instalt allround the country charging spots whioch are owed by usually oil or fossil fuel suppliers namely petrol station thus by doingso allow them to control the suppy thus compensate the revenue they used to generate of fossil oil ...in fact it is just switching from supply fossil oil to eletrcial charging spots ........in orther they adapt to the change not to loose clients and money .....
In the past we called a grab digger to dig our Latrine holes ...with the introduction of modern WCS latrine diggers became plombers .....so that they can continue to get job ..
Hydrid,electrical vehicles teduce fiel consumpts for sure and air polution,greenhouse gas but increase electricity consumption...in other words Fiel stationscwould generate lesscrevenues whilebPUC will See ian increasevin electricity consumption..theregore govtcdoes not lost revenues for sincebpuc will See increase oft it consumption.
A electoral plug in hybrid can go 300 kilometers.
Once the batteries down, it switches to fossil fuel.
What can incredible invention.
A electrical plug in can be connected to Panels and solar cell sun generating energy.
It does not have to be plugged to PUC. It can be 100% solar.
We as a Nation, can set the right example, and benefit our people, at the same time, instead of screwing them as GOS has become use to doing.
A serious change of mind set at MOF is necessary to move Seychelles in the right direction.
So far, MOF is letting us down.
Sesel Pou Seselwa!
Christopher Gill
You,re totally right ,it does not have to be plugged to PUC..........GOS,MOF must lead by example.......after all we have been classed as Developed country ........
I READ IN tODAYS nATION A NA ARTICLE ON durgs>..
IT IS STATED THST "THE CHRUCHE DOESNOT LIEK IT OR OPPOSE AND THE ISLAM TOO"wELL it is neither the churche or ISAlm who must decdied what the people want or not ........but the people themselves ..and this via a REFERENDUM .......as to islam they donot have nayjthing 5to tell us ,,the majority who are christaINS .ISLAM BUT GO AND CIVILIZE THEM ,,,RESPECT WOMEN RIGHTS ,BAN STONING ,,,,REMOVE THIS saud TRADITIONAL CLOTHINGS THEY WERE FOR IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH MUSLIM BUT THE saud TRIBASL TRADITIONAL CLOTHING ....
society IS GUIDED BY RULES OF LAW ...AND CITIZEN GIVE THEIR OPINION BY PROTEST OR rEFERENDUM ...NOT VIA CHRUCHES OR AN ARCHAIC IDEOLOGY CALL iSLAM ....
gOVERNEMNT MUST HOLD A REFERENDUM ON THE ISSUE AND ALLOW THE CITIZENS TO DEICDE NOT PRISSTS ,NOT THESE ISLAMIC TERORISTS OR ANYONE ELSE....
refenrendum IS THE LEGal and constitutional means that ogvenremnt have to use to consult citizens not preists or imans or else .....
HODL A REFERENDUM On THE ISSUE PL as the constituuion ask you do when you want to consult citizens ...stop speaking in their names and decding in the names without theire consent.
sOCEITY IS GUIDED BY ruels of law NOT AN IMAN ,A PRIESST OR A INDAIND HINDU DONKEY ..
tHE MEANS THAST THE CONSTIUION PROVIDES GOVENREMNT TO CONSULT CITIZENS IS CALLED referendum AS STIPULATED CLEARLY IN WIHTE AND BALCK IN OUR CONSTITUION ,,,,,,NOBODY SHOULD BE DECIDING IN THE PEOPLES NAMES .........
conduct A REFERENDUM THEN THE PEOPLE WIL LTELL YOU WHAT THE WANT PL NOT PREIST ,NOT ISLAMIC TOERRISTIC IMAn or indains hindus ,
The constitution provide Refenrendum as legal ,constitutional means to consult citizens Pl .so hodl a referendum on the issue and Seychellois will decide and what they diceded that is it ...no one ..be it Islamic teorrists called islam ,or preist or indian hindus.....
the latter have no birth right on Seychellois and nor have they the right to deicde and speak in our names or decide for us. ..
give us a break pl .Preist ,Iman ,hundi gurs ....you are not our father or mothers and nor the constitution ....
The only legal means to consult citizens POL/LDS is a referendum ..nothing else
First ever case on human trafficking is openeded .but not against Michel government and khalfia who transported hundred of indains in containers but company ...
it is outrageous and disturbing .....or what about sex slaves in Kempskin hotles ....are these not human trafficking ....
Dito time to reduce foreigners importatation into our land .......put Seychellois first and stop colonization oof pur land qwith indains ,Paksitanis terrorists ,Bangahdesh or else pl...
pl wanrts to crease TAX ON HYDRID ,,,LEGALIZING GRASS WOULD ALLOW GOVERNEMTN TO GENERATE MULTI MILLIONS MORE THAN WAHT puc OR TAX OR HYDRID WOULD GENERATE ...cONSULT THE PEOPLE ON dRUG LEGALIZATION PL ,,,,VIA REFERENDUM AS THE CONSTITUION ASKS YOU TO DO SO ,,NOT BY PRIEST ,IMAN, OR iNDAIN HINDUS .....BUT SOLELY THE constitution PL....ANYTHING ELSE IS ILLEGAL AND NOT CVONSTITUIONAL .AND UNACCEPTABLE...,.....NOT TO SAY ILLEGAL ..
referendum pl
The legal and constitutional means to consult citizens is called REFERENDUM ,,not preist ,imans ,or hindu gurus ..but solely what stated IN THE cONSTITUTION ..
nOR HAVE PREIST ,IMANS ,GURUS ANY RIGHTS TO DECIDED ,SPEAK AND TELL US WHAT TO OD ......WE ARE FREE SOUL AND OUR OWN BRAINS ...
wE WILL NOT LET AN iMAN FOLLOWING AN ARCHAIC ,TERRISTIC ,PRIMITVE IDEOLOGY TELLS US CHRISTIANS WHAT T OD ......THE IAMN SHOULD GO AND MODERNIZE HIS IDEOLOGY OF TERROR AND ...STOP STONING WOEMN ,,,STOP WEARING saDU tribe clthong that has nothing to do with islam ..sopt
hind guru should go back to india withhis thousands of indains illegally colonizing Seychelles shores ..
as to the P{reist the have their opinions but their opinio9ns are not the people opinions and they have nothing to tell us ...
we the people must decide non\t a priest ,an iman ,an indian guru or nayone else //
We awating that pl hodls a referendum on thr issue of drug .......that is the elgal means given to politicans to consult the people not cpreist ,iman ,or indain gur
give us a break pl ..dictatorship is over ...
Pl tells UD,priest,im an, arevagainst legalization of grass.well they are not what is called Referendum in the constitution thus habe no legal rights to speak,think and decided in seychellois Palace their opinions regards then and only Thema not seychellois and pl must no try ti make US believe priest and imab habe a constitutional and legal rightvto decide innourvplace
Whether pl priest im an linke itbor not that tgeirbproblems only thebpeople will decide by Referendum and what the people decided should applicablr in law
3.42
you right ,governMENT when need to consult citizens must hold a Referendum ,no go to priest ,iman ,or Indian gurur ..What the priest ,iman and the guru think is their personal opinion and they have no legal ,moral .and constitutional rights to think ,speak ,decide or anything in the name of the people.If tommorrow a refgerendum is hold and seychellois in theri majority decdied to allow the legalization of GRASS as it is being the case in many civilized countries in the western world ,,,that would be it ...no one would change it whether they like it nor not.Whaqt the people decided would be implwmnted and if politicians do not like well then they must leave their position as minsiters aND GO FIND ANOTHER JOB.
We will not let Pol,priest ,iman ,Indian guru decdie in our place ..never..
As to the Iman ,he should go and search for his lost identity and dignity ,,,go tell arabs to abolish stoning of women and respect women rights ,stop raping under age girls ,,and teroroism ..as to the Indian guru ,he must know that his present in our land aS THE MAJORITY OF THE SO CALLED HINDU COMMUNITTEE LOF WHICH IS MADE OF LITERALLY 99 PERCENT ILLEGAL INDAINS LIVING IN OUR LAND ..HE SHOULD GO TO HELPÜ Modi FIND UNITY AMONGST OTHER INDAIN RELIGIONS AND HELP GET INDIANS OUT OF ACUTE POVERTY AND MAYBE STOP cASS SYSTEM WHICH IS A HUMAN RIGHT ABUSE ..Moral LESSONS WE SURELY DO NOT NEED FOR hUNDI GURU OR A GUY WHO LOST HIS DIGNITY AND IDENTITY CAN AN IMAN ,,WHOSE BELEIVE IS ARCHAIC ,PATRIACAL,PRIMITIVE,,,,,,,,,,,tHE IMAN SHOULD EXPLAIN US WHERE IS IT STATED IN THE Koran THAT WOMEN MUST COVER THEIR HEAD OR COMPLETELY THEIR FACE ..........FOR WE HAVE BEEN SEARCHING FOR DECADES IN THE KORAN OF THE CLAUSE THAT SAID THAT ...BUT NONE CAN FIND ...ALSO HE MUST TELL US WHY IS HE WEARING A Saudi ara>bain TRADITIONAL CLOTHING DATED BACK LONG BEFORE mUHAMMAD OR ISLAM.....AND THEREFORE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ISLAM ...JUST LIKE A raG IS AN INDAIN TRADITIONAL CLOTHING AND NOT A RELÖIGIOUS ITEM.
tHE IAM NSHOULD SHUT UP ,,,HE HAS NO MORAL LESSON TO GIVER CHRISTIAN .....BUT RATHER GET HIMSELF OUT OF ARCAISM ,PATRICALISM ,...
Driving those cars on flat terrain is great but when you hit the mountain you will feel losing horse power. You will hear strange sound from the engine like tax-tax tax.
6.16
we understand that hydrid is a combi of electrical and fuel powered motor .....thus when the hit mountains you switch from hydrid to fuel.........believe me there are many countries with higher mountains ,steepest mountains then Seychelles and they donot seem to have this problems.
Pl contntiues to gfit out our passport to GOPS and exapts ..time to stop this bullshit pl ...
You married with or have Seychellois family members ..GOps and exapts came to work in return for money not fro nautralization ,,this shit must stop ...
Mitsy tell us .Syrian who we donot know how he is in Seychelles .indain ,sri lnakan and othese pests where gifted our paassports in order to colonize ,modify Seychelles society ,culture ,and trandtion ..
On renewable enrgy ..we been calling on Pl to AHVE A REAL nATIONAL POLCIY IN REGARDS TO CHANGING FROM FOSSIL FUEL TO RENEWABLE ENRGY ...IKE SOALR PANELS ,,MADREV WILL TRUBINES ....BUT THERE IS ALSO A NEW DEVELOPED TECHNOLOGY WHEREBY seawater COULD BE CONVERTED INTO HYDROGEN ..hOW IT WORKS .....USING THE SO CALLED ELECTROLYTICCATION EXCHANGE MODULE (E-CEM)THIS CONVERT THE SEAWATER INTO HYDROGEN WHICH IS THEN USE PRODUCE eLCTRICITY ......
tHE COST TO TRANFORM OR CONVERT SEAWATER INTO A oNE GALLON OF lIQUID FUEL IS MORE OR LESS $ 3 TO s6 OR sr 19 A GALLON....THAT IS WHAT ONE GALLON OF FUEL COST AT THE PUMP IN SEYCHELLES ....COMBINING SLAOR PANEL ,,,,mAGREV WILL TURBINES AND THSI NEW TECHNOLOGY ,,,,IT PROVIDE ENOUGH POSSIBLITIES TO SWITCH FROM FOSSIL FUEL TO RENEWABLE ......ALL THE MEANS ARE HERE WHAT IS NEEDED IS pOLITCAL WILL BY OUR GOVERNEMNT TO GET THING DONE ..AND THE INTERSTING THING ABOUT SEYCHELLES IS THAT IT Has a small population thus could in a few yaers .if there is political will make Seychelles the first country in Africa to go 100 percent green ..it is possible ,the technologies are there ,,,there unfortunately a lack of intersts in our government to get it done which is a shame .....especially when we see the cost of fossil fuel and the damage it does to our people health.....and the cost it endure on us .....
In toher words ,government should maybe speak less and act more ..we hear repeatedly govt blah balhing about environment ,ocblue economy ,green economy ,climate change but actions donot follow .......
Post a Comment